The Arc of Crisis

America’s basic strategy against the Soviet Union, during the Cold War of the last half of the 20th century, involved the Iran-Contra Operation, by which illicit funds were procured from the sale of narcotics in order to finance the Mujahideen of Afghanistan against the Soviet Union, coordinated by Saudi Arabia. The first stage of this strategy was to install a puppet regime in Iran that would serve American interests. This was accomplished in the person of the Ayatollah Khomeini. The propaganda to this effect involved mostly employing the issue of nuclear energy, a strategy spearheaded by the Aspen Institute, together with the United Nations, the Club of Rome. The reason offered was that proliferation of nuclear energy as an alternative posed a threat to the oil interests.Claiming deceptively that it was the environment, which was being destroyed, they instead rallied against “industrialisation” and for “limits to growth”.

As Robert Dreyfuss described, the impoverishment of the Third World was a deliberate policy of British colonialism, in which it employed corrupt regimes like that of Saudi Arabia, and radical terrorist cults like the Muslim Brotherhood. He writes:

For Americans, British sponsorship of the Muslim Brotherhood should not be surprising. The policy of the British Empire was to maintain London’s colonies in a state of underdevelopment. In the Middle East, the British have always sought out the corrupt tribal leaders and the venal clergy to lead movements whose objectives have always seemed to coincide with the British objectives. With the Muslim Brotherhood, British Imperial policy was institutionalized in the form of a disciplined organization dedicated to returning the Middle East to the Dark Ages. ¹²³

The explosion of violence throughout the Middle East, in the late seventies and early eighties, was not something which occurred by chance, but was the result of a deliberate plan developed by the Illuminati strategists, such as Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and British operative Bernard Lewis. In 1979, Bernard Lewis attended a Bilderberg meeting in Austria and contributed to the discussion of “Muslim Fundamentalism”. The Bernard Lewis Plan is the code-name for a top-secret British strategy for the Middle East. Lewis’ Plan endorsed the Muslim Brotherhood movement behind Khomeini, in order to promote the “Balkanisation” and fragmentation of the entire Muslim Near East. ¹²⁴

Lewis argued that the West should encourage nationalistic upheavals among minorities. The result would be, in Brzezinski’s terminology, an Arc of Crisis. Brzezinski, who served as National Security Advisor during the Carter administration, believed that global dominance was dependent on the control of the numerous states of Soviet Central Asia. Brzezinski had, in turn, been seduced by Bernard Lewis into believing that Islamic fundamentalism could be played as a “geo-strategic” card to destabilise the USSR.

This strategy would be achieved by employing all the covert means made available through Illuminati channels, and with the CIA again exploiting the services of the Muslim Brotherhood, to foment revolution and deface the image of Islam. Despite all their posturing as defenders of orthodoxy, the Muslim Brotherhood were using the pretext of seeking to implement the global “caliphate”, or global Muslim rule, to seek the destruction of Middle Eastern societies, to conspire with the Illuminati towards the implementation of a New World Order, based on occult principles. As described by Robert Dreyfuss:

The real story of the Muslim Brotherhood is more fantastic than the mere imagination of the authors of espionage novels could create. It functions as a conspiracy; its members exchange coded greetings and secret passwords; although no formal membership list exists, its members are organized into hierarchical cells or “lodges” like the European freemason societies and orders. The Muslim Brotherhood does not respect national frontiers; it spans the entire Islamic world. Some of its members are government officials, diplomats, and military men; others are street gangsters and fanatics. While the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood are at home in plush-carpeted paneled board rooms of top financial institutions, at the lower levels the Muslim Brotherhood is a paramilitary army of thugs and assassins.

At its highest level, the Muslim Brotherhood is not Muslim. Nor is it Christian, Jewish, or part of any religion. In the innermost council are men who change their religion as easily as other men might change their shirts.

Taken together, the generic Muslim Brotherhood does not belong to Islam, but to the pre-Islamic barbarian cults of mother-goddess worship that prevailed in ancient Arabia. As much as the peddlers of mythology might want us to believe that the Muslim Brotherhood and Ayatollah Khomeini represent a legitimate expression of a deeply rooted “sociological phenomenon”, it is not the case. Nor does the Muslim Brotherhood represent more than a tiny fraction of the world’s Muslim believers. ¹²⁵

The Muslim Brotherhood had its headquarters in Geneva, where its leader, Said Ramadan, who was married to the daughter of Hasan al Banna, set up the Institute for Islamic Studies. In Cairo, Ramadan had been indicted on charges of conspiring to murder Nasser, and was accused of maintaining ties with Israeli intelligence.¹²⁶

In 1973 Ramadan founded the Islamic Council of Europe, with headquarters in London, together with Salem Azzam, of the important Azzam family.

By allying itself with a faction of the Muslim Brotherhood, the Club of Rome and the Aspen Institute began agitating against the Shah of Iran. The Club of Rome shifted the focus of the Muslim Brotherhood in Western Europe around their “zero-growth” version of Islam. The Shah of Iran had originally been installed by a CIA sponsored coup, orchestrated by Kim Roosevelt, and H. Norman Schwartzkopf, father of the Gulf War General of same name. The reason was to overthrow Mossadegh, who had been popularly elected president in 1953 and who dared to nationalise the nation’s oil industry. However, the Western powers later became opposed to the Shah’s attempts at developing the country’s nuclear power industry.

Footnotes:

123 Robert Dreyfuss, Hostage to Khomeini, p. 101. [PDF]
124 Scott Thompson and Jeffrey Steinberg. “British Svengali Behind Clash Of Civilizations”. Executive Intelligence Review. November 30, 2001.
125 Robert Dreyfuss, Hostage to Khomeini. p. 100.
126 ibid, p. 106.